Cite as: [Unpublished]
re Francis A. Rondeau, a/k/a Francis Rondeau,
a/k/a F. A. Rondeau, and Marie Rondeau, his wife, Debtors
Bankruptcy Case No. 82-00736-11
United States Bankruptcy Court
W.D. Wisconsin, Eau Claire Division
November 4, 1987
Gary McCartan, for debtors.
Stewart L. Etten and Arthur L. Eberlein, for First American National Bank of Wausau.
Thomas S. Utschig, United States Bankruptcy Judge.
MEMORANDUM OPINION, FINDINGS OF FACT,
AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
The First American National Bank of Wausau (FANB), by Stewart L. Etten and Arthur L.
Eberlein, has filed a motion to convert this Chapter 11 case to a case under Chapter 7 of
the Bankruptcy Code. The debtors appear by Gary McCartan and object to the motion. The
debtors further seek to have this case voluntarily dismissed. A telephonic conference was
held in this matter on October 9, 1987.
The debtors filed their Chapter 11 petition on April 30, 1982, and still have not filed
a plan or disclosure statement.
FANB argues that "cause" exists pursuant to § 1112 of the Bankruptcy Code to
convert or dismiss this bankruptcy case. The debtors do not dispute the fact that such
"cause" exists. However, the debtors contend that this case should be dismissed
rather than converted. FANB asserts that it would be in the best interests of creditors if
this case was converted to Chapter 7.
It is the opinion of the Court that this case should be dismissed. It does not appear
that it would be in the best interest of anyone, with the possible but doubtful exception
of FANB, that this case be converted. It appears that all the creditors of the debtors,
except FANB, are either current in payment or have been paid in full and have no interest
in the continuation of bankruptcy proceedings. FANB has its state law remedies against the
debtors and apparently will eventually have to pursue such claims in state court
regardless of whether this matter is converted or dismissed.
The decision whether to convert or dismiss a bankruptcy case is largely in the
discretion of the Bankruptcy Court. The central factor in this determination is what is in
the best interests of creditors and the estate. H. Rep. No. 95-595 to accompany H.R. 8200,
95th Cong., 1st Sess. (1977) pp. 405, 406; S. Rep. No. 95-989 to accompany S. 2266, 95th
Cong., 2d Sess. (1978) p. 117. Although FANB asserts and the Court agrees that there have
been substantial delays in this bankruptcy case, it is the decision of the Court that this
case should be dismissed as there has been no showing that continuation of the case would
result in any substantial benefit to creditors.
This opinion shall constitute findings of fact and conclusions of law in accordance
with Bankruptcy Rule 7052.